Back to top

From Dredging to Gravel Removal: How River Management Has Changed

Posted: 17/09/25

For decades, dredging rivers was seen as the solution to flooding. By digging out riverbeds and making channels deeper and wider, communities believed they could keep rivers flowing and manage flood risk. But over time, this approach has proved costly, environmentally damaging, and often ineffective.

Today, dredging is rarely used in the UK, replaced instead by more sustainable, catchment-based approaches. Where intervention in rivers is still necessary, gravel removal is now the preferred method. This blog explores why dredging has been largely phased out, the impacts it caused and why gravel removal has become its replacement.

This blog been written by a member of the Newground Flood Team.

 


 

The History of Dredging

Dredging, the large-scale removal of sediment from riverbeds, has been carried out in the UK since the 18th century. In addition to managing flood risk, it was used to keep waterways navigable, improve drainage for farmland, abstract gravel and sand for construction, and maintain flows to mills.

In the mid-20th century, dredging became widespread as a flood defence measure. However, by the late 1980s, its drawbacks were becoming clearer, and it was largely phased out as a primary flood management tool.

 

What is Dredging and Why Was it Phased Out?

Dredging involves removing large volumes of gravel, silt, and sediment from rivers, often deepening or widening entire channels. While it may appear effective in the short term, there are major problems:

Flood risk management limitations
Dredging can increase capacity locally, but it often makes flooding worse downstream. By increasing the speed at which the river flows, it reduces the lag time, and water reaches downstream towns faster and in greater volumes, raising peak flood levels. The benefits are also short-lived, as sediment can quickly redeposit, sometimes in a matter of weeks.

Environmental impacts
One of the strongest arguments against dredging is the damage it causes to river ecosystems. Rivers are living environments, not just channels for water, and large-scale dredging and desilting can have lasting consequences:

  • Loss of habitats – gravel beds provide spawning grounds for fish such as salmon and trout, as well as shelter for insects and plants that form the base of the food chain.
  • Reduced water quality – disturbing sediments makes rivers cloudier (more turbid), which can reduce oxygen levels and harm fish eggs and aquatic life. Additionally, suspended silt in the water can also release harmful chemicals which may be present as a result of historic industrial activity on the waterways.
  • Erosion – removing gravel destabilises riverbanks and alters natural river processes.

Costs and maintenance
Dredging is expensive and requires constant repetition, as rivers naturally transport and redeposit sediment. Over time, this became financially unsustainable.

Bedrock limitations
Another key factor is that many rivers sit on or cut down to bedrock channels, particularly in upland areas. Once the riverbed reaches bedrock, dredging cannot deepen it further, meaning there’s little or no flood benefit, but the environmental damage and costs remain.

Because of these factors, dredging is now regarded as a controversial and outdated practice in UK flood risk management. These days, the Environment Agency will only undertake dredging in locations where it remains economically viable, would not harm the environment, and will have an impact on reducing flood risk.

 

 

 

The Shift in Flood Management

By the 1990s, flood management in the UK began to move away from “digging out” rivers towards more holistic, catchment-wide approaches. Instead of focusing only on moving water downstream as quickly as possible, the aim is now to slow the flow, store water safely and manage flood risk across whole river systems. To read more about how flood risk is managed, visit our page here.

Flood risk managers today use a range of approaches, including:

  • Natural Flood Management (NFM)
    Techniques such as tree planting, leaky dams, and wetland restoration help to slow the flow of water through catchments. These methods not only manage flood peaks but also improve habitats, biodiversity and water quality. To read more about NFM, visit our page here.
  • Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)
    In urban areas, SuDS reduce surface water runoff before it reaches rivers. This includes permeable paving, swales, ponds and green roofs. SuDS also improve water quality and provide green spaces in towns and cities. To read more about SuDS, visit our page here.
  • Upstream storage
    Purpose-built storage areas can temporarily hold floodwater during extreme rainfall, protecting downstream communities by reducing peak flows.

These approaches are not only more cost-effective in the long term, but also provide wider benefits, from boosting biodiversity to improving public spaces, making them a more sustainable choice than dredging.

 

What is Gravel Removal and Why is it Different?

Although dredging has been largely phased out, some intervention is still needed where gravel naturally builds up. This is where gravel removal plays an important role. Gravel removal focuses more on the removing the small rock particles which form gravel bars and collect around in-stream structures such as bridge supports. The Environment Agency now focuses on gravel removal rather than dredging, recognising that selectively removing sediment from key pinch points is far more effective and environmentally sensitive.

Gravel removal is the targeted extraction of sediment from specific locations, for example, around bridges, culverts or other areas, where excess gravel could cause blockages and raise flood risk.

Unlike dredging, it is narrow in scope and only carried out where there is a clear need.

 

Why Gravel Removal Has Replaced Dredging?

Gravel removal is seen as a more practical alternative because:

  • It directly addresses localised flood risks without reshaping entire rivers.
  • It helps keep infrastructure, like bridges and weirs, clear of blockages.
  • It is less damaging to ecosystems than large-scale dredging.

That said, gravel removal is not a perfect solution:

  • Rivers often replenish gravel quickly, meaning benefits are temporary.
  • Work cannot go deeper than the natural bedrock.
  • It still requires maintenance and monitoring.

Despite these limitations, it has become the preferred intervention where action is necessary. The Environment Agency now supports gravel removal in specific, justified cases rather than dredging entire river systems.

 

In-river Maintenance

When it comes to riparian landownership and watercourse maintenance, although activities such as gravel removal, or the removal of sand bar for example, may require an environmental permit from the Environment Agency, there are exemptions from permits for smaller scale activities and where the relevant criteria are met. These exemptions are only applicable to works in designated main rivers and are known as Flood Risk Activity (FRA) exemptions.

These can include the following:

  • FRA21: Removing silt and sand from bridge arches and any material from existing culverts.
  • FRA22: Removing silt and sand adjacent to in-river structures.
  • FRA23: Dredging to remove accumulated silt and sand from the bed of up to 1.5km of man-made ditches, land drains, agricultural drains and previously straightened watercourses that are main rivers.
  • FRA24: Dredging to remove accumulated silt and sand from the bed of up to 20m of a main river (FRA24).

A full list of flood risk activity exemptions and their relevant criteria can be found here.

Although permit exemptions for in-river works must still be applied for, and granted, by the Environment Agency, it allows riparian landowners to either maintain their section of river themselves or allow a contractor to do so on their behalf.

For works on ordinary watercourses, consent must be obtained by the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), and riparian land are advised to contact their LLFA to discuss works and any necessary consent.

 

River management in the UK has evolved significantly since the days of dredging. Today, flood risk is managed more sustainably, using approaches that slow water, store it safely and protect communities across whole catchments. Where intervention is needed, targeted gravel removal helps manage localised risks without harming ecosystems. By focusing on these smarter techniques, we can keep rivers healthy while keeping people and places safe.

 

Click here to download our ‘Gravel Removal’ Resource